<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The problem with n=1 and ‘evidence’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.runningbarefootisbad.com/the-problem-with-n1-and-%e2%80%98evidence%e2%80%99/120/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.runningbarefootisbad.com/the-problem-with-n1-and-%e2%80%98evidence%e2%80%99/120/</link>
	<description>Exposing barefoot runners for the nutters that they are</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:28:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What does the barefoot running community continually fall for this nonsense?</title>
		<link>http://www.runningbarefootisbad.com/the-problem-with-n1-and-%e2%80%98evidence%e2%80%99/120/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>What does the barefoot running community continually fall for this nonsense?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.runningbarefootisbad.com/?p=120#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] I have already gone over how the barefoot running community generally misrepresented and misreported the Liebermann research and how they misrepresented and even lied about the Kerrigan research, so now let’s take a closer look at the online article that they all seem to quote as ‘evidence’ (and we all know that the barefoot running community does not even really know what evidence is). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have already gone over how the barefoot running community generally misrepresented and misreported the Liebermann research and how they misrepresented and even lied about the Kerrigan research, so now let’s take a closer look at the online article that they all seem to quote as ‘evidence’ (and we all know that the barefoot running community does not even really know what evidence is). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

